<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webkit GTK (and QT) get plugin support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jbablog.com/2008/05/webkit-gtk-and-qt-get-plugin-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jbablog.com/2008/05/webkit-gtk-and-qt-get-plugin-support/</link>
	<description>the personal blog of John BouAntoun</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jba</title>
		<link>http://jbablog.com/2008/05/webkit-gtk-and-qt-get-plugin-support/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>jba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jbablog.com/?p=32#comment-53</guid>
		<description>In my experience, when looking to embed a html engine in a windows app adding a dependency on gtk+ is not a good idea. There are many, many cool windows gtk+ apps (I've used pidgin for a long time), but each one comes with it's own shipped version of gtk+ sometimes causing conflicts. A native win32 port also has the benefit of using native widgets in the form elements that will obey the user's desktop theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, when looking to embed a html engine in a windows app adding a dependency on gtk+ is not a good idea. There are many, many cool windows gtk+ apps (I&#8217;ve used pidgin for a long time), but each one comes with it&#8217;s own shipped version of gtk+ sometimes causing conflicts. A native win32 port also has the benefit of using native widgets in the form elements that will obey the user&#8217;s desktop theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Meyer</title>
		<link>http://jbablog.com/2008/05/webkit-gtk-and-qt-get-plugin-support/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jbablog.com/?p=32#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Do you need something that is only win32 or can it use Qt or Gtk on Windows?  At least the Qt port on Windows is doing really well.  Qt 4.4 includes a demo browser that you can play around with and look through the source.  With a nice simple API (that isn't going to change) embedding WebKit with Qt on windows is easy.  If you google for Qt demo browser you should get a bunch of hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you need something that is only win32 or can it use Qt or Gtk on Windows?  At least the Qt port on Windows is doing really well.  Qt 4.4 includes a demo browser that you can play around with and look through the source.  With a nice simple API (that isn&#8217;t going to change) embedding WebKit with Qt on windows is easy.  If you google for Qt demo browser you should get a bunch of hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lord</title>
		<link>http://jbablog.com/2008/05/webkit-gtk-and-qt-get-plugin-support/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jbablog.com/?p=32#comment-50</guid>
		<description>It's maintained upstream - http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk/ - Have a look in WebKit/win - how well it works, I don't know, but probably as well as the gtk backend, minus the plugin support</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s maintained upstream - <a href="http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk/" rel="nofollow">http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk/</a> - Have a look in WebKit/win - how well it works, I don&#8217;t know, but probably as well as the gtk backend, minus the plugin support</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jba</title>
		<link>http://jbablog.com/2008/05/webkit-gtk-and-qt-get-plugin-support/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>jba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jbablog.com/?p=32#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Well I may be wrong, but I haven't seen a viable, actively developed win32 port of WebKit recently. 

I may not be looking in the right places, but I'd be happy to change my views if you have a decent link. Even searching for http://google.com/search?q=win32%20webkit doesn't seem to bring up a specific coherent project for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I may be wrong, but I haven&#8217;t seen a viable, actively developed win32 port of WebKit recently. </p>
<p>I may not be looking in the right places, but I&#8217;d be happy to change my views if you have a decent link. Even searching for <a href="http://google.com/search?q=win32%20webkit" rel="nofollow">http://google.com/search?q=win32%20webkit</a> doesn&#8217;t seem to bring up a specific coherent project for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lord</title>
		<link>http://jbablog.com/2008/05/webkit-gtk-and-qt-get-plugin-support/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jbablog.com/?p=32#comment-48</guid>
		<description>er, there already is a native Win32 back-end of WebKit? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, there already is a native Win32 back-end of WebKit? <img src='http://jbablog.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
